Reproduce
Reproduce
Don’t trust the website. Run it.
The strongest ZeroModel claims should lead to executable code, tests, or committed evidence packages. This page starts with the smallest cross-runtime proof and then points into the repository for deeper experiments.
Lua cross-runtime policy proof
The repository includes a bounded arcade policy that can be materialized in Python and exported as a dependency-free Lua module.
From a ZeroModel checkout:
python examples/lua_edge_policy.py
lua examples/lua/run_arcade_policy.lua
The independently reproduced run reported:
policy rows 112
generated module 21,235 bytes
python score 4
lua score 4
python steps 22
lua steps 22
runtime Lua 5.4
The generated consumer carries the policy artifact identity and a separate consumer-plan identity.
What this demonstrates: bounded policy runtime portability and identity preservation across Python and Lua.
What it does not demonstrate: embedded-device latency, memory use, tiny-hardware performance, or cloud/edge symmetry.
Symbolic policy lookup
Run the bounded arcade policy example:
python examples/arcade_shooter_policy.py
This demonstrates deterministic policy lookup over the finite state table and provides the baseline behaviour later visual-address experiments must preserve.
Visual sign reader evidence
The visual reader’s current strongest bounded evidence is committed under:
docs/results/visual-sign-reader-hardening/
docs/results/visual-sign-reader-contract-hardening/
The recorded result reproduces:
- 112 / 112 canonical row recoveries
- 112 / 112 canonical action equivalence
- 2,401 / 2,401 four-target waves
- 31,213 visual decisions
The contract-hardening work separates canonical-only, exact-codeword, calibrated-nearest, and evidence-only acceptance semantics rather than treating every visual match as the same claim.
Controlled provider representation experiment
The fixed-provider PNG experiment is preserved under:
docs/results/controlled-png-representation-v1/
Its importance is methodological: provider configuration, prompt, parser, policy, fixture, and inference settings were held fixed while only the identified representation recipe changed. The tested implicit interventions did not pass the promotion gate.
Fixed-camera state claims
The current fixed-camera path is split deliberately:
canonical panel pixels
→ typed field evidence
→ compatible finite states
→ policy compatibility
→ execute common action or reject ambiguity
The deterministic compiler and canonical fixtures are executable today. Real optical capture performance remains a separate unmeasured boundary.
See:
Demo catalogue
ZeroModel also maintains an executable demo catalogue covering VPM artifacts, visual sign reading, Lua edge policy export, signs-not-directions traces, criticality verification, policy lookup benchmarking, Bertin pattern detection, FX triangular arbitrage, and Tiny Critic evidence.
Browse the repository demo catalogue
If a website claim cannot eventually point to something runnable, inspectable, or explicitly marked unmeasured, it should not be promoted as evidence.